Quantitative Comparison of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Music Therapy Research: A Methodological Best-practices Analysis to Guide Future Investigation for Adult Psychiatric Patients

M. J. Silverman

Journal

Journal of Music Therapy

Year

2008

Volume

45

Issue

4

First Page

457

Last Page

506

Abstract

While the music therapy profession is relatively young and small in size, it can treat a variety of clinical populations and has established a diverse research base. However, although the profession originated working with persons diagnosed with mental illnesses, there is a considerable lack of quantitative research concerning the effects of music therapy with this population. Music therapy clinicians and researchers have reported on this lack of evidence and the difficulty in conducting psychosocial research on their interventions (Choi, 1997; Silverman, 2003a). While published studies have provided suggestions for future research, no studies have provided detailed propositions for the methodology and design of meticulous high quality randomized controlled psychiatric music therapy research. How do other psychotherapies accomplish their databases and could the music therapy field borrow from their rigorous "methodological best practices" to strengthen its own literature base? Therefore, as the National Institutes of Mental Health state the treatment of choice for evidence-based psychotherapy is cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), aspects of this psychotherapy's literature base were analyzed. The purpose of this literature analysis was to (a) analyze and identify components of high-quality quantitative CBT research for adult psychiatric consumers, (b) analyze and identify the variables and other elements of existing quantitative psychiatric music therapy research for adult consumers, and (c) compare the two data sets to identify the best methodological designs and variables for future quantitative music therapy research with the mental health population. A table analyzing randomized and thoroughly controlled studies involving the use of CBT for persons with severe mental illnesses is included to determine chief components of high-quality experimental research designs and implementation of quantitative clinical research. The table also shows the same analyzed components for existing quantitative psychiatric music therapy research with adult consumers, thus highlighting potential areas and elements for future investigations. A second table depicts a number of potential dependent measures and their sources to be evaluated in future music therapy studies. A third table providing suggestions for future research is derived from a synthesis of the tables and is included to guide researchers and encourage the advancement and expansion of the current literature base. The body of the paper is a discussion of the results of the literature analysis derived from the tables, meta-analyses, and reviews of literature. It is hoped that this report will lead to the addition of future high-quality quantitative research to the psychiatric music therapy literature base and thus provide evidence-based services to as many persons with mental illnesses as possible.

Music and Health Institute Terms

Mental Health; Music Listening; Music Medicine; Psychological Outcomes; Recorded Music Listening

Indexed Terms

Biomedical Research; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Evidence-Based Medicine; Guidelines as Topic; Mental Disorders; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Psychotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; United States

Study Type

Quantitative Methods; Systematic Review

Disciplines

Psychiatric and Mental Health

PubMed ID

19256728

Document Type

Article

More Info

Share

COinS